“I know nothing more annoying when people I don’t know jump to conclusions on my person based on nothing but gossip or speculation.” ~ Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, actor, producer and screenwriter
I’m no fan of the simplicity of using the either A or B personality formula. It is not very academic or scientific. A and B type personality assessments were intended to determine the likelihood of a person having a coronary. You can look it up.
It is a poor tool for determining overall temperament, character analysis, social style, or general personality. Unfortunately, in the business world, it has been used as a screening tool, with an assumption of some iron-clad rule that one type is more likely to succeed than the other, and that the template works the same for all jobs in all industries. That would be not only incorrect, it would be foolish. Here’s your real A/B:
“One group of people believes everything can be divided into one of two groups. The other group of people doesn’t.”
Never treat supposition as fact. That would be no more scientific than using a coin toss to make all important decisions. Also, be cautious of the risk of falling prey to illogical deductive reasoning:
“All safe motorcycles have at least two good wheels. My lawnmower has at least two good wheels. Therefore, my lawnmower is a safe motorcycle.”
That’s right, factual perhaps in the statements, but the conclusion is ludicrous; not very scientific at all. So, if it isn’t scientific, what is it? Emotional? Well? Don’t most people make decisions because of what they feel more than by what they think? Yes, they do.
A good example of the is when a person buys a car. No matter how analytical they thought they were during the process, the decision to buy is ALWAYS an emotional one. The only plausible argument with that would be that what you are feeling does go through your mind.
Most people who try to measure behavioral qualities of other people by using generalized cookie cutter templates might find some of the erroneous conclusions they will draw to become problematic; even harmful. This mistake is also a common occurrence with self-assessments, too.
When a person reads a profile of themselves they like, and considers it flattering, they will want to believe it true whether it was in the astrology section of todays newspaper, or a fortune cookie. Believing such things allows thinking to not seem so necessary. And people do prefer a set of beliefs far more than they do the idea of having to logically analyze empirical evidence, or even look for it. Modern psychology has come up with much better tools, but using them does require some thought and effort.
Look at people as individuals instead of using some presuppositional tool to put labels on them. Folks are likely to resent labels, especially if they believe they came by superficial means. Don’t forget about the times you have felt you were judged incorrectly or wrongly by someone who was obviously being prejudicial.
So it is with that in mind that I ask you to please be cautious about using any simplistic template where any of the descriptive labels used will be seen by the people you are “judging” as judgmental. When they discover what you’ve concluded or said, it is very likely to come across to them as unfairly critical, narrow-minded, condescending, or possibly rude if not mean-spirited.
Some folks prefer simple explanations, or at least the appearance of them. By that measure, they will think this A/B tool is wonderful. Those go for the simplicity of it are likely to quickly pack it away in their toolbox along with the other belief disorders they have collected over the years. And that toolbox usually holds things folks have learned to believe on their own by jumping to conclusions, or have been taught to believe in accordance with the leap some other person or persons want you to take.
But as I’ve said before, what people believe to be true to in fact be true, is not now, nor has it eve been required. But be careful when it come to challenging what other people insist they believe. They might attack you, or even kill you if they feel it necessary to, not so much for themselves personally, but that their beliefs be kept safe. For without ideology, idiotic or otherwise, you cannot have war.